Leaflet wrote: Again an example of a case where

I've had a customer that has been with me and photographed their dogs. In a shooting ingr pappersfrstoringar and images in webbupplsning. Customers from posting pictures on the internet as long they do not take away a signature that I have lngst down at the edge of the pictures. Now I have a customer who does not accept that I have my signature on the pictures when she publishes pictures on the internet. Her reasoning rvldigt fuzzy. She says she does not want others to take similar pictures and drfr not want my name should be on the picture. It has therefore been given nothing mars curiosity landing to do with it "understands" the big picture on the picture. Now she has published mars curiosity landing several photos mars curiosity landing on the block and removed my signature even though I said that she did not frgra it. Does she have the right to make s? She says that she kpt my tjnst and not my pictures and that she frvntat the images without signature. Drfr accept she's not the pictures with my signature. Bee
Frgra the card, did you have an agreement where they stood that the images supplied with your byeline / signature and that it should be left at anvndande? If they r yes on the The question's customer has done wrong if it dremot are no or well ok, they svrare mars curiosity landing and more diffuse. frgra a parable are those forfeiting into showrooms and best models of a car rdfrg. No, you will come the day after he has designs painted in his log lngst down at framdrrarna. They would probably not accept. Yes foolish to take a billiknelse but hope pongen went forward.
samtr0n wrote: Frgra the card, did you have an agreement where they stood that the images supplied with your byeline / signature and that it should be left at anvndande? mars curiosity landing If they r yes on the The question's customer has done wrong Sorry I have no written contract but I told her it orally. / / Bee
hmm yes d they become a little more well, see my answer above. but which one is the SVRT. It hr with gandertt and digital content creation is a real rra, and many who do not know Hr you can find some interesting lsning "Certificate FAQ from the brochure 't nk p as the author "." -> Http://www.sfoto.se/bilder-och-upphovsratt mars curiosity landing
samtr0n wrote: hmm yes d they become a little more well, see my answer above. but which one is the SVRT. It hr with gandertt and digital content creation is a real rra, and many who do not know, she has manipulated my picture in that she cropped it's my signature frsvunnit.
Member Since: Apr 2007 Posts: 5065
No, it is not legal at all. I think that trdskaparen not just shrug your shoulders mars curiosity landing and p Allocating down flat for this. The customer has the wrong s that stnker about it! She has kpt pictures, but she seems to think she has kpt upphovsrtten mars curiosity landing also, which is not at all is the case. Limitations of her that she must show an agreement on that she may make use of the images just the way she wants. Without agreement from she not publish your photos at all, she may make use of them solely for their own private use. You gave her an oral Permits to f make use of the images on ntet, but not without your signature, and not to f change them. She believes (or wants to convince you) that she can use your photos as they wish, beskra pictures she wants, and even de-identify them, just because she has "kpt mars curiosity landing them." But this is crime against upphovsrttslagen. Scissors a few points about Upphovsrtt in the article Bjrn lnkade to above: 5th FR PICTURE changed? No changes in the image frgras without the author's Permits. It applies beskrningar, retouching, digital manipulation or other changes. ... 6. WILL PRODUCE MAN'S NAME LISTED NO IMAGE is used? The author's name must be specified No image are used. The obligation to indicate the author fljer of upphovsrttslagen and lies in the author's moral upphovsrtt to the image. ... Sg her that if she does not respect mars curiosity landing what you have given her tilltelse mars curiosity landing to gra, s fr she did not make use of a few of your photos verhuvudtaget p ntet, even with your name on it. She has nmligen mars curiosity landing not right to make, if she can not show an agreement between you that she frgra this (posting them on ntet). mars curiosity landing And even nrsdana agreement freligger, s have buyer who said nd never right to utelmna author. What I understands, she also uses your photos frfrsljningsndaml - is she doing to sell dogs? If rs that she uses your images for commercial ndamls I think you almost require from her on normal mars curiosity landing publication charge for this ndaml, plus extra tillgg f r otillten publication. For it is exactly mars curiosity landing what it is! And it is a punishable offense. Obviously, you frst frska the soft route, by informing mars curiosity landing her of the laws and bestmmelser that apply, and that she breaks against. Sometimes it rcker with this. .
Leaflet wrote: Again an example of a case where "it said did not exist." Create a document, a contract, where you type in what applies between you and the customer. Use the and it then consistently. Ice which case