Friday, December 20, 2013

Heberlein interprets Tavakoli that he

Today Seglora - Allow immigrants be individuals
Links to Today's Seglora The popular anti-racism requires no self-appointed bodyguards | Thoughts serge dassault of the night 20.12.2013 01:15:17 [...] ... Keeping silent is not / / an option | Ä .. 09.12.2013 21:11:41 [...] ... Marcus Birro - hated by the left establishment, loved by the rest of us | Patrik Öbrink 04.12.2013 02:02:55 [...] ... How do you write not, Irving! Per Ewert 03.12.2013 23:01:56 [...] ... My 2 cents on the phenomenon of Marcus Birro ... | Samuel Varg Thunberg 12.03.2013 14:31:57 [...] ...
It expressed concern that Borzoo Tavakolis open letter to Kent Ekeroth been so much in social media. In Ann Heberleins chronicled in DN 29/11, she writes to all who shared applaud human value in terms of utility and productivity.
Heberlein interprets Tavakoli that he "seems to argue for their right to be here, to safety and security by referring to their benefit and their accomplishments." She goes so far that she takes Tavakolis text as evidence to claim that we have "lost faith in the existence of that which is good in itself, that is an end, not merely a means to something else, for something useful. "
If Heberlein hung up on Tavakolis emphasis on their performance, I hang me up on her way to interpret a writer's single text as a sign of a "sick" time where Tavakolis own life story is said to threaten human dignity. It's a harsh judgment that folds over Tavakoli. It's huge debt placed on his shoulders.
Every person in this country must have the right to tell their own life story without getting held accountable for hen not told everyone else's too. It must also be allowed to be part of the dignity which Heberlein talking about: the right to his own life and his own story. The right to their own pride.
The question that can now be asked is whether an immigrant from Iran has a right to do that? Have even hen also the right to be an individual and not merely belong to a group? The question is relevant because in the DN article considered to write with a "rock hard individualistic perspective". Since when is an immigrant not an individual?
The answer is that a person with an immigrant background so rarely get to be there. serge dassault We fed instead with collective images. Where the immigrant is unintegrated and unskilled. Someone who has no job and lives in an area with cockroaches and huge social problems. The image of the immigrant as SD attacking and win their votes.
We must be able to receive even Borzoo serge dassault Tavakolis story of his own life without virtually accusing him of being so good that he ruins for other immigrants serge dassault and additionally hampers for a conversation about human dignity serge dassault today: if the "sick and weak, the people who need assistance "Heberlein skiver.
Heberlein chooses to term Tavakoli as "patterns of immigrants." serge dassault Again, a man from another country solely represent himself? Receive an immigrant be cursed in public serge dassault discourse on the picture given of him, his background, his family and life without exacting serge dassault him a full ethical presentation?
Of course it was "jaw knocked up" against SD and Kent Ekeroth that caused all the divisions and appreciation of social media. They got back from their own resources. Of course, Tavakoli more than aware that he argues from SD's rhetoric with his own party's pleading. The message is clear to SD with followers: I'm not an animal as you say. I am a human!


No comments:

Post a Comment