The planet Mars is also called the red planet because of the abundance of iron oxide present nasa pictures in his roc ce surface. And 'the color that make us see the images nasa pictures of NASA. Too red, the sky is instead described as being yellowish-brown. Among amateur astronomers nasa pictures are making their way doubts about the authenticity of the chromatic official images. First, because the planet taken from amateur telescopes does not seem as reddish as in the photographs of NASA? Indeed, it appears with streaks of green and blue? The theory of color artifacts, which would be painted the planet would be in agreement with images showing dark spots of vegetation and caps of some ice bluish in color. Here are some examples of photos compared: very dark zones are also apparent in the pictures of the melting curve analysis, inispecie nasa pictures in the equatorial zone, without any convincing explanation provided. If there are beings on Mars plant capable of photosynthesis, namely oxygen in the air, the sky should not appear yellowish like the pictures that the various little robots sent to the surface we send. Moreover, the presence of both oxide in the surface rocks might suggest that a fair amount of molecular oxygen (blue) is present in the Martian atmosphere. In addition to the recombination of CO2 and other oxygen compounds that constitute over 95% the atmosphere. Even images nasa pictures taken by the space telescope Huble contain the color blue (above) nasa pictures in the atmosphere of Mars otherwise absent in the most famous photos. It can be assumed that if the intent of astronomy canonical hide the presence of life on Mars, the US space agency may have altered through filters the true colors of the planet. Astronomers should explain the origin of the blue color of the Martian nasa pictures sky.
Numerous studies on the photographs sent from the centers of acquisition appear to have been "altered" how to hide blue-green tones that would put in crisis scientists intent on convincing the public that Mars is a dead planet, just a cold and red rocky desert. NASA often defines nasa pictures "false color" certain photographs reddish Mars while on the books and newspapers falsehood color is omitted. There are photographs taken by "lander" the first Viking '76 that clearly show shades of blue, just analyze the image using any graphics software, if one does not trust its own monitor. Every so often emerge photographs that appear realistic thus causing nasa pictures even a little discussed nasa pictures issue: the fact that the light on the Martian surface has to be similar if not greater nasa pictures than that which illuminates the surface of the Earth. In fact, the red planet is located about 80 million miles farther from the sun of our (but there are only 50 million km between perihelion and aphelion our) then, being its atmosphere much less thick, a higher percentage of light should reach the ground. The photograph below shows probably the true Martian landscape.
Official figures seem to attest that on Mars there is a climate very similar to the Earth, scale planetologica, of course: a polar ice cap, four seasons alternating with evolutionary models of the climate identifiable. The main difference is in the ground pressure which would be very low: 0.6-1.0 kPa (101 kPa against the Earth) a physiologically empty. A pressure comparable to the same at 50 km altitude on Earth. Furthermore, the temperature, even for short periods greater than zero, is expected to remain constantly rigid, especially during the night. In a range between + 27 and -143 in the summer at the poles in winter. nasa pictures The combination of temperature and pressure according to the scientists would prevent the existence of liquid water if not in fact extremely transient. But these assertions clash with some considerations. Evidence indicates the pressure to be decidedly superior to that reported officially: The first thing is the existence of dust storms and eddies capable of raising enormous amount of material, even at low wind speeds. Another nasa pictures reason to suspect it is less understood. The various organizations, NASA head, who sent probes to the planet, argue that they have landed softly thanks to a parachute. The trouble is that with an atmospheric pressure "officially" so low, if the parachute is opened, the air density would offer resistance so tenuous as not to slow down enough to the vehicle. With the result to crash to the ground Martian probes. How is it then that these objects are landed without going to smash? In many photographs shadows nasa pictures are rather dim and murky as to indicate an atmospheric density far from comparable
No comments:
Post a Comment